The specialist recommendations and you may information publication writers inside their decisions and you may make sure that wrote scientific studies are good, rigorous, and you will credible. Editors see fellow writers primarily because of their in-breadth experience with the topic amount or types of the task he or she is requested to check. That it options are invaluable and you will irreplaceable. Fellow writers are responsible for the accuracy and you may views conveyed within the the accounts, therefore the peer remark techniques operates toward a principle of common trust ranging from article writers, reviewers and you will publishers. Even with fast improvements, generative AI tools provides big limits: they are able to lack up-to-big date knowledge that can establish absurd, biased otherwise not the case guidance. Manuscripts can also are sensitive or exclusive suggestions that ought to maybe not be common away from fellow feedback techniques. For these reasons i ask that, if you are Springer Nature examines getting our very own fellow reviewers with entry to safe AI gadgets, fellow writers dont upload manuscripts towards generative AI units.

If any part of the research of your own claims manufactured in the fresh new manuscript was a student in any way backed by a keen AI device, i inquire fellow writers so you’re able to declare using particularly units transparently from the peer comment statement.

Citations

Browse posts and you can low-browse posts (e.g. Thoughts, Feedback, and you can Opinions posts) need to mention compatible and you may relevant literary works in support of the fresh new states generated. Too-much self-pass, coordinated operate certainly multiple article authors in order to together thinking-cite, gratuitous and you may a lot of pass away from stuff blogged on diary to help you that your paper has been submitted, and every other variety of ticket control are poor.

Violation manipulation will result in the article being refuted, and might feel stated so you’re able to authors’ institutions. Similarly, any attempts by the fellow-writers otherwise publishers so you’re able to remind such as for instance methods might be stated because of the authors on the journalist.

• Experts must look into the following guidance when preparing the manuscript:
• People statement in the manuscript that utilizes external resources of guidance (i.elizabeth. not the latest authors’ very own the newest ideas otherwise findings or standard training) is to have fun with a pass.
• Article writers should avoid mentioning derivations from original really works. Such as for instance, they must cite the first work in place of an assessment blog post one alludes to a distinctive functions.
• Experts is make sure the citations is perfect (i.e. they should guarantee the solution supports the latest declaration produced in their manuscript and cannot misrepresent an alternate really works by citing they if it generally does not support the section the article authors need to make).
• Experts should not mention present they’ve not read.
• Article authors ought not to preferentially cite their otherwise its friends’, peers’, otherwise institution’s products.
• Writers is always to prevent citing works exclusively from 1 nation.
• Article authors should not use a too high amount of citations to help with some point.
• Essentially, writers is to cite source which have gone through peer feedback in which you’ll be able to.
• Writers shouldn’t cite advertisements or advertorial thing.

Preprint sharing and pass

BMC guides encourage upload off preprints off primary look manuscripts into the preprint servers of one’s authors’ solutions, authors’ otherwise institutional websites, and you may open communication ranging from boffins whether on neighborhood preprint host or preprint commenting platforms.

Preprints try recognized as an enthusiastic author’s style of a research manuscript in advance of authoritative peer feedback at the a journal, that is transferred toward a general public machine (since revealed in the Preprints into the lives sciences. Research 352, 899901; 2016); preprints is generally published when for the peer review process. Posting away from preprints is not believed past guide and does not threaten consideration from the BMC periodicals. Manuscripts printed toward preprint machine will never be taken into consideration whenever deciding the improvement provided with a survey at issue within an excellent BMC log.

BMC provides partnered that have Lookup Rectangular ( BMC have a big part interest in Lookup Rectangular) to provide In Feedback, a record-integrated solution to own preprint sharing, support authors all over all of the groups we are designed to display its search early. Article authors entry for some BMC guides are also able to publicly share facts about the peer feedback because of When you look at the Opinion. General facts about For the Feedback from the BMC as well as the Look Square preprint platform can be acquired here and here .